I just returned from a great program that used concepts from Reframing Academic Leadership by Lee Bolman and Joan Gallos to encourage the analysis of complex organizational situations using multiple perspectives or “frames”:
- Structural – organizations viewed as complex machines; leader as analyst/architect, strategic emphasis on planning/analysis/implementation; focus on policies/rules/logic.
- Human Resources – organizations viewed as families; leader as coach/catalyst/partner; strategic emphasis on building relationships/facilitation/empowerment; focus on communication/teamwork/skills.
- Political – organizations viewed as “jungles”; leader as advocate/negotiator; strategic emphasis on networking/attracting allies/defusing opposition; focus on building power base/gaining access to key players.
- Symbolic – organizations viewed as “theaters”; leader as visionary/artisan; strategic emphasis on symbols/rituals/stories; focus on creating meaning/vision.
We all have our typical or preferred frames that we instinctively use to understand our organizational environment. However, if we rely only on our preferred frame(s), we can easily misunderstand or misinterpret the situation and miss the big picture. “Reframing” involves purposefully examining situations using all four frames to make sure that we are getting the full picture and identifying solutions that address the most important issues.
While targeted at leaders, I think that these frames are useful for understanding your organizational context regardless of where you are in the organizational hierarchy.