In the conclusion of “The Existential Pleasures of Engineering,” Samuel C. Florman claims that in the face of technological change, we have no choice but to press ahead.
In the case of smartphones, must we press ahead? Or should limitations be established—be they by government, by common agreement, or otherwise—that constrain this technology, in response to some of the concerns raised by the readings?
Remember to make reference to at least one of the assigned or optional readings. It may also prove useful to make reference to an earlier technology (e.g. radio, television) in support of your argument.
The middle ground could certainly be the basis for an exemplary response. It might be more compelling, however, to argue for one extreme or the other. Augmenting your response with reference to an additional text provides you with the opportunity to both strengthen your argument and demonstrate your level of engagement. And as always: be clear, concise, coherent, and creative. Remember that all Writings must be 350-500 words—and that longer isn’t necessarily better.
Writing 1 is due at 11:55PM on Sunday, February 4.
Exemplary Examples
Brandon Casas (but put your name in the file please, Brandon!)